Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Pediatr Hematol Oncol ; 45(4): 174-180, 2023 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2301616

ABSTRACT

The sickle cell mutation increases morbidity in those with sickle cell disease (SCD) and potentially sickle cell trait, impacting pulmonary, coagulation, renal, and other systems that are implicated in COVID-19 severity. There are no population-based registries for hemoglobinopathies, and they are not tracked in COVID-19 testing. We used COVID-19 test data from 2 states linked to newborn screening data to estimate COVID outcomes in people with SCD or trait compared with normal hemoglobin. We linked historical newborn screening data to COVID-19 tests, hospitalization, and mortality data and modeled the odds of hospitalization and mortality. Georgia's cohort aged 0 to 12 years; Michigan's, 0 to 33 years. Over 8% of those in Michigan were linked to positive COVID-19 results, and 4% in Georgia. Those with SCD showed significantly higher rates of COVID-19 hospitalization than the normal hemoglobin Black cohort, and Michigan had higher rates of mortality as well. Outcomes among those with the trait did not differ significantly from the normal hemoglobin Black group. People with SCD are at increased risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization and mortality and are encouraged to be vaccinated and avoid infection. Persons with the trait were not at higher risk of COVID-related severe outcomes.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , COVID-19 , Sickle Cell Trait , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Sickle Cell Trait/diagnosis , Sickle Cell Trait/epidemiology , Sickle Cell Trait/genetics , Neonatal Screening/methods , Georgia/epidemiology , Michigan/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Anemia, Sickle Cell/diagnosis , Anemia, Sickle Cell/epidemiology , Anemia, Sickle Cell/genetics , Hemoglobins
2.
AJPM Focus ; 1(1): 100010, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1914359

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Two mRNA vaccines approved in the U.S. have high efficacy against COVID-19 disease from the original strain of SARS-CoV-2. We evaluated the population-level association between vaccination status and COVID-19 infection by age group during the initial wave of the Omicron variant in a diverse population in the Mid-South U.S. Methods: In this observational population-based cohort study, vaccination information and positive COVID-19 cases in Shelby County, Tennessee, from December 12, 2021 through January 22, 2022 were collected from surveillance data at the Shelby County Health Department (Memphis, Tennessee). Exposure groups included individuals who were unvaccinated, were fully vaccinated, and were fully vaccinated + booster. We calculated incidence rates of COVID-19 diagnosis per person-year among county adult (aged 18+ years) residents in crude form and stratified by age group. Results: In this population-based study, we identified 64.56% fewer COVID-19 infections in the fully vaccinated + booster group and 41.08% fewer in the fully vaccinated group than in the unvaccinated group. Conclusions: These results confirm and extend the findings of recent immunologic and epidemiologic studies in a racially diverse region of the Mid-South U.S. In stratified analysis, we also found evidence suggesting that vaccine protection against Omicron may increase with age.

3.
J Thorac Oncol ; 17(5): 651-660, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1796405

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the effects of the global coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on lung cancer trials, we surveyed investigators and collected aggregate enrollment data for lung cancer trials across the world before and during the pandemic. METHODS: A Data Collection Survey collected aggregate monthly enrollment numbers from 294 global lung cancer trials for 2019 to 2020. A 64-question Action Survey evaluated the impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials and identified mitigation strategies implemented. RESULTS: Clinical trial enrollment declined from 2019 to 2020 by 14% globally. Most reductions in enrollment occurred in April to June where we found significant decreases in individual site enrollment (p = 0.0309). Enrollment was not significantly different in October 2019 to December of 2019 versus 2020 (p = 0.25). The most frequent challenges identified by the Action Survey (N = 172) were fewer eligible patients (63%), decrease in protocol compliance (56%), and suspension of trials (54%). Patient-specific challenges included access to trial site (49%), ability to travel (54%), and willingness to visit the site (59%). The most frequent mitigation strategies included modified monitoring requirements (47%), telehealth visits (45%), modified required visits (25%), mail-order medications (25%), and laboratory (27%) and radiology (21%) tests at nonstudy facilities. Sites that felt the most effective mitigation strategies were telehealth visits (85%), remote patient-reported symptom collection (85%), off-site procedures (85%), and remote consenting (89%). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic created many challenges for lung cancer clinical trials conduct and enrollment. Mitigation strategies were used and, although the pandemic worsened, trial enrollment improved. A more flexible approach may improve enrollment and access to clinical trials, even beyond the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Neoplasms , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Pandemics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL